Thank you, Ms. Idlout.
I'm going to have to make a ruling on the admissibility of this.
The amendment attempts to create an obligation for financing that doesn't currently exist in the bill. As House of Commons Procedure and Practice, third edition, states on page 772:
Since an amendment may not infringe upon the financial initiative of the Crown, it is inadmissible if it imposes a charge on the public treasury, or if it extends the objects or purposes or relaxes the conditions and qualifications specified in the royal recommendation.
With that, in the opinion of the chair, the amendment proposes a new scheme which imposes a charge on the public treasury. Therefore, I rule the amendment inadmissible.
Unless my decision is going to be challenged, we'll move on to NDP-34.