I don't know if I should wait until you've said your piece.
To Mr. Carr's point, I don't think we need opinions from the Clerk of the House. I think the House is pretty clear that it was Randy Boissonnault, considering that he has been at the core of this whole issue by co-owning a company, which has bid on projects or contracts, that's claiming to be wholly indigenous-owned when clearly that's not the case.
Obviously it was Randy Boissonnault that the committee and the House wanted. We would expect that it would be he who has been ordered to appear, given the fact that when the motion was passed, he was in fact the minister named in the motion.