Unpacking that further, again, we've addressed a similar thing with similar amendments.
I do wish that the co-development piece was there for first nation governing bodies, but entering into the conversation with the provinces and territories again is further complicating this. That would be a concern, as you mentioned—that it's not clear.
The other piece is that we're under clause 22, so it's all about “If requested to do so by a First Nation governing body”, yada yada yada. It's already implied that they're going to be the ones requesting that. They're the ones at the table who are stewarding this process, so I do see it as an additional layer.
Again, we did work with many partners to put this together. I'm wondering specifically where that amendment from our Conservative colleagues came from. I am just curious, because I think it's important to the conversation.
Those are my thoughts for now. Thank you.