Thanks. I appreciate the question.
Maybe I'll start at the beginning and focus on PV-3, at the end here.
How this reads to me in isolation is that it would compel a first nation. A first nation must provide clean water for all residents in their home. This is binding on a first nation, not on Canada. It would have an ancillary effect on Canada, but this would compel first nations' action.
I also feel that—to take us back to day one or day two—we enshrined.... In this proposed legislation, there is already a domestic right for first nations to have access to clean drinking water. I would be concerned about the competing factor there. The precedent in law would be historic if the passed G-1 in this legislation becomes enshrined in law. I feel that is a very significant bar. I haven't done the legal analysis, and I'm not a lawyer to compare and contrast those things. However, the bar is very high because of G-1. It's enshrining, for the first time ever, a domestic right for all first nations to have clean and safe drinking water.
I could stand corrected. I apologize to the chair, but this seems to be binding on a first nations government body to provide those actions.