I think that there needs to be a good discussion on what we are doing with protection zones. There have been a number of amendments and subamendments. If we talk about this now, I think we're putting the cart before the horse.
I'd like to get consensus around the protection zones and then come back to this, because the wording of the NDP's motion speaks to the protection zone without our having a clear definition of what that is.
I think that we're close to a definition that most parties and stakeholders can live with. Can we put this on hold until we get to the protection zone? I feel that the discussion around the protection zone is going to be the one that is crucial to whether this clause can work.