I'm going to go to the officials on this, but it seems like this clause is going to be exactly what we've been discussing about protection zones. Looking at this particular one with the St. Lawrence River, I understand the principle and agree with it, but it seems like we're taking a shortcut for the St. Lawrence River when it's a protected zone.
I think we've come close to getting some consensus around wording that not only respects the first nations but also respects provincial jurisdiction. If we add this clause here, it will take away from what we've been discussing about the protection zones. That's my understanding of it.
I'd ask the officials if this seems like a very specific reference to something that we're discussing in broader terms when we're talking about the protection zones.