There are two things. First of all, we already voted on that amendment, and my understanding is that we can't go back. If we could go back, then I would want to go back to some amendments that we voted on that I wish we had passed. I'm just saying.... Second, nothing in this bill, from my understanding, tells me that either French or English is prevented from being used. There is nothing in the bill currently that prevents either language.
In addition, the Government of Canada and its Crown corporations—I don't know what the language is—are already bilingual institutions. We already have French and English provided for in all these spaces. Knowing that for the first nations water commission, being a creature of this legislation, those resources will be provided for English and French, there is nothing at all preventing either English or French, is there?
What I would like to ask the witnesses, in response to what he was saying.... Could they respond to what he was saying?