When you stack the language side by side, I see a greater adherence to the concepts of the dialogue that this bill brought forward, including—and not to be verbose—that this clause 31 speaks to adequate, predictable, stable, sustainable, needs-based and comparative costs. Those are the bedrock of the funding dialogue or the funding framework that we just concluded and will return to.
It could be narcissistic in terms of the differences, but I would see this one being a bit more prescriptive and aligned to the language that we've been so diligently reviewing.