I don't think we're opposed to this.
It appears from what the clerk said that we want to give a realistic timeline and that there are some questions that need to be answered. I think that's a discussion that we should definitely have, but I don't think that December 16 is a realistic target.
I know that we've worked hard at the INAN committee over the last month, with additional hours. I think that in order to be fair to our staff, to our team here, the folks who are doing all of the good work that goes on behind the scenes, we should give them a bit more time on this.
I would ask if the Conservatives are willing to give the team here more time as you put more meat on the bones of your motion in terms of how much this will cost. The Conservatives are willing to spend good taxpayer money for this. With that, I'm just asking to ensure that for the amendment, we have more time as we flesh out the details that the clerk has provided.