Thank you for your question.
We have presented the road map to both ISC and CIRNAC. They have received it. They're not opposed to it, but we'd like to see it dealt with, and with a better sense of urgency, okay? We can't wait for two years or three years for this stuff to be implemented. We need it to be accepted. We need them to declare that it will be accepted. We need it resourced through the parliamentary appropriation process. We think that the three institutions have proven, by what has been accomplished to date, the value for money when we ask for it.
What I would like to see is a declaration that the path to reconciliation, while not excluding other approaches, is defined in what we're doing, in what the road map reflects, and a commitment to ensure that all three of the institutions—because we're all speaking basically about the same kind of thing but saying it a little differently—get what they need to be able to implement their visions.
I think there's a difficulty, as I said in my opening comments. There needs to be a change in attitude, policies, regulations and legislation in order for these things to be achieved, and we have to agree that we have to start doing that now. We can't wait the 10 years that it took to get the FMA legislation passed for these kinds of changes to take place. There has to be an increased sense of urgency.