I think it's important to appreciate that the value of the infrastructure institute is to be able to utilize the monetization that hopefully will come, but it also provides value in looking at alternative procurement processes, such as public-private partnerships and stacking of revenues. If a first nation wants to use its own-source revenue, if it wants to use the money to provide infrastructure that's not just for domestic community use but also for economic development use, that needs to be enabled. The definition of what infrastructure is needs to be expanded. If you don't have connectivity to the Internet, you don't have an economy in today's world.
So a lot of policy issues have to be considered, but the main one is monetization of revenue streams and to not penalize a first nation if they choose to stack capital money from the department with their own money.