Totally, and I will do my best to do it as quickly as possible as well.
What you see in the slides are two parallels of governance. One is the Anishinaabe Nation in Treaty 3 and the other is western governance systems, in that instance harmonized through the signing of Treaty 3.
What most often happens when we talk about, say, child protection or emergency management working “in partnership” with Crown entities is that they say they'll fund this work to do it this way and this is the way they expect it to be done. They provide the protocols by which it will be done, and it needs to be worked within that western track.
That is the issue. For child care, for example, it is the federal and provincial governments that are dictating how Anishnaabe children are being cared for. Really what we need to be looking at is how to harmonize those governance approaches so that it's actually the Anishnaabe Nation in Treaty 3 protocols and processes that are guiding child care, so that they are being cared for in a way that is culturally appropriate and safe and doesn't go back to policies around integration into a western parallel.
At the end of the day, when we talk about participation and inclusion of traditional knowledge and nations, we need to look at harmonization and operating in that treaty space, as opposed to just participating or trying to move one governance structure into another governance structure.