It's a great question.
I met with Commissioner Ignace this morning to speak about the work that's ongoing and the work that the commission is doing. There's an opportunity here, I think, to cross-pollinate. I think that it's odd to say you're limited only to language, because language is identity, and it falls into every aspect of the calls to action as well as the work that the commission will be doing.
Commissioner Ignace's work is targeted specifically to how the work that needs to be done on indigenous languages is still outstanding, and the recommendations that have to be made by the government are related to that particular area of language, which is obviously so key to this debate.
I do think there will be an opportunity. They shouldn't limit each other in their approach. For example, I wouldn't think this commission would abstract itself from the calls to action that deal specifically with language. They can have other views, which is their right, but I do see the opportunity to feed into each other and to have a better approach as we talk about something in this country that we're not very good at talking about or at least having an intellectual debate on, which is language, particularly in the promotion of indigenous languages, which both colonizing languages have contributed to destroy. That's something that is an ongoing challenge, but it will be an opportunity in both the form of the language commissioner and this board.