So people agree on the principle, but there is still a question of legitimacy that will arise for a number of them. We are unable to establish the exact proportions, but, before pronouncing for or against the bill, we must be aware that this question will arise.
I have other questions, but I think I will have to wait until my next turn to speak on some of them.
I would like to talk about the independence of the body that will be created. Obviously, as it is being created, it is necessarily linked in some way to the government, at the moment. I wonder how it will work in terms of the composition of the body itself. You want it to be totally independent, like any board. So you have to ask yourself whether the government is funding some of the organizations that are represented. I'm not necessarily talking about conflicts of interest here, that's not what I mean, but we need to see if there are any difficulties that might arise and, if so, think about ways to resolve them.
We don't know exactly what the composition of the board will be. There is talk of organizations in general, for example women's and youth organizations. But often these organizations are already receiving government grants. I wonder how they are going to be able to say that they are absolutely free to do and say what they want on the board of the organization.