Exactly. Thank you.
I have a last question before I run out of time. I'm going to frame this very quickly.
Dr. Wilton Littlechild, who was a member of both the interim board and the transitional committee, expressed some frustration around the term “efforts for” in the legislation. I think the sense is that it's kind of fluffy or soft. We find in the legislation, even though it was not in the interim board's draft legislation, the term “efforts for” six times.
I'm curious to know whether you would support the amendments that would suggest maybe we should take out the words “efforts for”, and in the context it would change is to say that we're actually talking about advancing reconciliation rather than just making efforts for. It kind of comes back to that measurable progress as well, I guess. Would you support that concept of maybe removing some of those terms, such as “efforts for”?