I appreciate that. Thank you.
Did anyone else want to comment? Okay.
I have one more question, and if any time is remaining, I'll turn it over to Mr. Vidal because I know he has a lot of questions.
Mr. DeGagné and Mr. Case, you both mentioned the different pieces of reconciliation. I believe “different sectors” were the words you used, Mr. DeGagné. This was in terms of economic reconciliation, land and rights. To the point that was raised earlier—I won't belabour it—we have heard folks mention in the committee that there should be a seat at the table for or a specific focus around economic reconciliation.
To the point that was mentioned about the different sections of reconciliation, do you believe there could potentially be a benefit to having more specific seats, not just for economic reconciliation but for rights as well, and some of those other sectors you mentioned?
I'll open this up to anyone who has a comment.