I appreciate that. I wanted to bring a little clarity to that and set my framework a bit clearer, if I didn't before.
I'm going to come to you with a question, Mr. Case, and you can add to others, if you want.
You talked about call to action 55 being provincial. I quickly went to look at it because I wanted to refresh my memory. I believe that out of seven points in call to action 55, five have a pretty significant federal component. In the legislation, we see a brief mention of call to action 55 in the preamble, but there's nothing in the “Purpose and Functions” section.
My colleague Mr. Schmale was talking about measurables. Some of my language around this has been.... Call to action 55 has some very clear and identifiable measures, so we can quantify and measure our success. There's the old adage that says what gets measured gets done. I would like to see some language that includes the items from call to action 55, but language that is not limited to just those. There are many more we could measure.
Would you agree that it's important we still measure some very quantifiable things to see whether we're achieving success on the journey to reconciliation?