With that in mind, I think I understand that wording, but I also understand that voting in favour of this would then mean that amendment LIB‑5 is not there, and LIB‑5 has an important place in this. I know that Mr. Weiler could probably speak to that.
For those reasons, we're going to oppose this, because we think amendment LIB‑5 has some strong wording around time frames that are important to this legislation, which maybe Mr. Weiler could speak to as well.