Thank you for that.
The other quick question I would have, in follow-up to that, is that in your third recommendation you talked about the more stable, longer-term funding models that would allow more predictability, more sustainability and the ability to look further down the road. If I heard you correctly, you used the comparison of the 10-year grant program to first nations once they've achieved the eligibility or certification requirements, which I assume are the same ones that are talked about under the First Nations Fiscal Management Act type of process that's going on there.
Could you just expand again briefly so we are very clear and we can get it into the report? I'd really like to hear your concept of how that applies to the AFIs as well, if you don't mind, just a little further dive into that third point you were making.