We are back in session for clause-by-clause consideration of Bill S-219.
I have here a page of reminders about how we do clause-by-clause study, but given that we have recently gone through Bill C-29, is it okay if I dispense with that? Does everybody sufficiently remember how it's done? I have a feeling that is the case. Therefore, we will proceed with clause-by-clause consideration.
As you know, pursuant to standing order 75(1), consideration of clause 1, which is the short title and the preamble, is postponed.
Shall clause 2 carry?
(Clause 2 agreed to)
Shall the short title carry?
This is clause 1, the short title. I don't see any objections. Therefore clause 1 is carried.
(Clause 1 agreed to)
For the preamble, we have a proposed NDP amendment. I will turn to Ms. Idlout and invite her to move her amendment and describe it as she wishes.