I'm going to run out of time, Minister. I want to move on.
In 2018, the Auditor General did a report. I'm going to paraphrase so I don't have to read all of it, but they were talking about recommendations to Indigenous Services Canada in connection with closing the socio-economic gaps, education being one of those. One of the things they said in the conclusions was that we have to find things that are actually improving the lives of indigenous people by using proper indicators rather than focusing on the amount of money spent. The ultimate goal is to improve lives and to close these gaps. The numbers I referred to are reported by Indigenous Services Canada, so we can move on from that and see where that goes.
There was also a discussion by the Auditor General back in 2018 that the graduation reports on reserves were being reported inaccurately. It was using a methodology that was measuring only kids who started in grade 12, not the cohort method, which goes from grades 9 to 12 or grades 10 to 12, like most provincial systems do. When we start comparing these rates.... You talked about the average being 85% or something like that. I'm talking about rates as low as 34%. The Auditor General talked about those rates being even lower than that, if we actually used the proper methodology.
It's my understanding that there is a new method that was agreed to by the ADM in August 2020, which would do the proper comparative rates. Are you aware of that? How has that impacted the rates you're measuring when you measure the success?