Yes, everything is relative. Nothing is black and white. I completely agree with you on that. Nevertheless, asking these questions is our job.
You talked about methodology, and of course, methodology can change. A change in methodology can help produce more accurate data, but there's no guarantee. That's why I asked the question again.
The Office of the Auditor General may not have done another audit, but I imagine it will at some point. Then we'll be able to see whether the methodology and other changes have led to more accurate data.
The use of the data, however, is an altogether different matter. We aren't talking about a study methodology. It's really about the use. What's being done with the data that are collected when they are relevant?
We weren't able to get into the second half of the question, but that may be something an audit would have to examine as well.
I think I've used up all my time, Mr. Chair.