Thank you, Mr. Giroux.
I guess there's another question I want to add to the mix. Let's face it: To some extent this is bigger than the country, especially because nothing's been done for over 200 years. On the extent of what we're doing now, this is trail-blazing.
Here we are now, taking on a big bite and working with these communities, but equally as important is not what we're going to have and invest in, it's also what we have from the past. I shouldn't say “we”. I should say “they”—these communities. What's equally as important is not just what we're investing in the new, but also important is what we have to invest in to manage the assets that exist. It could be buildings. It could be pipes in the ground. It could be water, sewer, treatment plants and distribution lines. It could be roads, sidewalks and facilities. The list goes on: schools, health care centres.... Again, the list goes on and on.
That said, do you find it equally as important under that disciplined structure that I referred to earlier not only to worry about, invest in and work with these communities to then ensure they have what they need in the future, but also to manage the assets they have now from the past in terms of their legacy?