I don't have a ton more to add.
I do think, by their nature, that these indicators do evolve, particularly with the work we do to co-develop them. It does sometimes impede the ability to look backwards and see the consistency of them. It would be helpful sometimes, when we look at the indicators, to look specifically at their quality and to scrutinize deeper into them.
You mentioned a more complete report. Not that I would invite more scrutiny, but certainly a more complete picture would probably have you posing more difficult questions into some of the real challenges that we continue to face.
Obviously, we need indicators to properly reflect where we are as a country and we need to be quite honest about what they actually mean at their basis. You could look at a couple of these indicators and say that 80% of this is done, but the remaining 20% is probably the hardest stuff to do. There's some scratching under the surface of these indicators that is well warranted.
Obviously, it's not the scope of this report, but I think for a matter of transparency and honesty, we foremost go to indigenous peoples. It's something that we have to continue to be committed to.