I gather that there aren't really any new developments. Correct me if I'm wrong, but those are ad hoc programs. There isn't an actual round table ensuring that all the measures are coordinated under a long-term vision.
You talked about significant investments in certain communities, but they aren't necessarily broken down here. Would you say those government investments are equitable across the board? I'll take it a step further. Are they equitable in relation to the communities? Obviously, as a member, I represent some of those communities, but I speak with other community members as well. The nutrition north Canada program still has dire problems. It doesn't even cover some communities, even though they meet all the requirements needed to be eligible because of their remote location.
First, do you think it's equitable? Second, do you think the programming needs to be expanded or reviewed at some point? Even though investments are being made, people in northern communities are still suffering because they don't have access to affordable good-quality food.