Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I want to thank all the witnesses, too, for coming today and enlightening us on the issue of land restitution.
My questions are for all the witnesses here today.
Since we started this study, we have seen how restitution is governed based on the different configurations for each nation, be it Métis, Inuit or first nations, or whether it's a modern or a numbered treaty. It depends, too, on where you're located. For example, Chief BlueSky said earlier that his lands were surrounded by lands that weren't Ojibwa.
Do you believe that, despite these different configurations, it's possible to ensure fairness among nations, be they Métis, Inuit or each of the first nations? With the passage of time, it's clear that no discussion is simple. Do you think that it's possible to be fair? Would any changes or corrections need to be made later, given how complex restitution is?
I mentioned you in my question, Chief BlueSky, so you can be the first to respond, if you'd like.