My time is very limited. I'm sorry. I want to get to another question, so perhaps you can share that in some way that is appropriate for you.
I appreciate the fact that you come with not only concerns but also some solutions. I appreciate the fact that you're offering some amendments, and very clearly. If those amendments were accepted by the committee—the people who have a say around this table—would that suffice in a way that makes you comfortable? I think I got from you a couple of elements that could be in those amendments: one, clarity around the impact on other rights; and two, a bit more clarity around the definition of who is represented by the MNA. That's the substance of what I think I caught.
Could you clarify for me, in the time we have left, whether Metis Settlements would be comfortable with this legislation, if amendments address some of those concerns?