We would, in theory, but it's not clearly defined. With your legislation, you end up going back to the agreement for the definition, because you don't have it defined in your bill. It's not defined, so where do you go? You go back to the agreement to find the definition. You go back there, where it says that within Alberta, any Métis eligible to be a part of the Métis Nation of Alberta.... Then, they are speaking for us. If it were clearly defined in the bill....
I know you can't change that, but you could recommend they take that part out, in that last table. Then it's fine. That was an agreement made between the Government of Canada and the Métis Nation of Alberta. That was just injected. The 2019 agreement did not have that in it. All of a sudden, in 2023, it's in there. Why?