For the Métis settlements, their concern, again, is that if Bill C-53 passes and receives royal assent and it happens, and a treaty proceeds and gets approved, and those kinds of things, then it would neither stop Fort McKay from coming forward to work on the same process—and I want to be clear—nor stop anyone from choosing between one or the other to represent them. Is that correct so far? Could they still be a member of—I'll pick randomly—Fort McKay?
Okay, we see a nod yes. Oh, I'm sorry; maybe we don't. I shouldn't out you like that. I'll wait for Martin to answer.
Could they be a member of both? I guess that was my follow-up question.