I'll consult with the clerk, but my understanding is that the dilatory motion needs to be dispensed with and would override the vote on the motion. Let me clarify.
I stand corrected. The technicality is that in order to resume debate, because it was brought forward before and debate was adjourned, as I understand, we need a vote then to resume debate on that motion. That's the same thing. It goes straight to a vote.
The motion that we have, then, is to resume debate on the motion. That will be the question that we put. If we vote in favour, then the debate continues.