The witnesses, when they were here, were concerned that we.... I guess what this bill is trying to do is.... In the Constitution there is the word “Métis”, and we're trying to define who that is. Who are those rights-bearing people? There was a bunch of concern around who gets to decide that. There were concerns around whether one community gets to decide it.
That's what my amendment is trying to get at: It's not just the MNA in Alberta that gets to decide who is Métis, essentially. That's what my amendment is trying to achieve. Is that not correct?