Thanks, Mr. Chair.
At this point, we've heard department officials reiterate a few times the legitimate points raised by my colleagues across the way. As Mr. Battiste mentioned, I think most are willing to support a version of this.
Ms. Idlout has put forward a version of this amendment, NDP-4.2, for which I think we will find widespread support when we get to that part of the process. I would like to encourage us to move forward now, as we have a variety of different amendments to discuss. We have heard the points raised. They are legitimate.
There seems to be consensus or support, by and large, that further clarity may help to alleviate some feelings and concerns that folks have vis-à-vis other Métis groups not represented by those listed in the schedule. We're there at that point. I'm not sure if it's even necessary, based on what the officials have said, but we agree that despite the fact it's not necessary, it has an added layer of protection. We're comfortable moving forward with that.
I would just like to encourage us to move forward to whatever amendment is up next. Thanks.