Mr. Chair, I want to reiterate two things.
I completely understand where Mr. Viersen is coming from, and Mr. Viersen, you'll correct me if I'm wrong.
You want to ensure, using some form of language, that a group of Métis in Alberta that is not represented, in their own view, by the MNA would not be left out of this bill and would not be excluded from a future agreement with the Government of Canada. I think that is the crux of what you want.
We have been told on several occasions that this is clear, even without the wording that we are currently debating. Before we even get into the debate and the difference between NDP-4.2 and your CPC amendment, we have already had that assurance. The more time we spend debating the difference in “collectivities” versus “people”, which is meant simply to serve as an added layer, the more we are just compounding something that we've already received the answer to.
Perhaps I can ask the officials.
Mr. Viersen, I can't remember the name of the specific group in Alberta you were concerned about.