I'll try to be quick here. We've exhausted that discussion point.
There are several amendments here that have all-party support. I almost feel that if we started going through the ones that we all support, we'd be in a better position to talk about the ones that we don't support because we'd have taken care of the others.
I know that might not be the most efficient way of proceeding, but I see that amendments CPC-1 and NDP-1 are very similar, and if we had passed that non-derogation clause we could have saved 20 minutes of discussion on this.
I'm just wondering how we can make this an efficient process by going through the things that we do support and then going back to all the things on which we might have disagreements.