Yes, specifically our partners are the Métis Nation of Ontario, the Métis Nation of Alberta and the Métis Nation of Saskatchewan. This terminology is consistent with the way they describe themselves as part of their internal meetings with their peoples and also with the constituting documents they have to establish their government. These terms are also the terms that are used in the agreements that are binding as contracts and were signed in February of this year with the three parties.
The forward-looking intention is for these terms to be defined clearly as part of the treaty. Before we would be in a position to finalize that treaty, we would need to consult with any group that thought we had established a definition that was too broad. For example, if Cadotte Lake was of the view that they were being captured by the Métis Nation of Alberta definition in the treaty negotiations, we would need to consult with them and ensure that we weren't adversely impacting their rights. That is how CIRNA arrives at final agreements.