That's noted. Thank you.
Not to continue to point to NDP-4.2, but I think the concern that you and Mr. Vidal are raising is that there are indigenous governments who have given testimony before this committee who have made clear their position that they have not authorized the MNA, for example, to act on their behalf. I think that's the same concern that you're touching on with this use of “Indigenous governing body”. It's been our collective testimony that the concern is not founded in the operation of that clause. The clause does not go so far as to suggest that these governments act on behalf of those who have not authorized them, but I do think the issue is precisely what NDP-4.2 is also trying to address.
Whether a definition of “Indigenous governing body” would be helpful, I leave to the committee to determine. I do think you're touching on the same issue that MP Idlout has tried to resolve with her proposal of NDP-4.2.