Fair enough. The amendments actually do require it to come back, but the way it was originally presented, the legislation would give force to the treaty, which the agreement is a precursor to, without it having to come back to be approved by Parliament or any other process. In essence, the legislation does give force to the agreements in an indirect manner.
Sorry, I'm just trying to figure out the flow. Now we have that option where it's still going to have to come back. That's the change. Am I understanding that appropriately?