Sure. As the one lawyer at the table, I'm happy to do so.
As I was explaining before the break, that change of phrase would make the text of that more consistent with the way the bill describes these concepts already.
The relationship between a government and a collectivity is one of “authorized to act on behalf of”, as opposed to “represented by”. “Represented by” isn't used elsewhere in this bill, but that other concept of “authorized” is there, so we would know what it means.