Thank you for your question.
I would say that the legislation really seeks to address those criticisms through the provision of flexible, sustainable long-term funding that is managed by the communities that have taken over this jurisdiction. I am well aware of the criticism that the administrative burden communities face is often onerous, given their unique circumstances. Through grants, we are trying to establish another form of funding, which is still planned for the coordination agreements. These are long-term agreements with built-in flexibility so that communities can fund their priorities and focus on prevention in the programs they implement.