Thank you for your question.
I'm going to answer in English.
The court found that the law was within federal legislative jurisdiction. In terms of extrapolating going forward, it's an opinion of the court; it's not a decision, so technically it's not binding, but it is treated as a precedent. Ultimately, they did find that it is within the federal Parliament's legislative jurisdiction. It's very difficult to speculate about what this means going forward. I think they were very careful to speak directly to the legislation and the question that were in front of them.