I can speak to it generally. Then my colleagues from Indigenous Services can speak about the program.
The UN declaration has been described as a “framework for reconciliation” in Canada. The court references that in its decision. As I mentioned earlier, it speaks very highly of the legislation that Parliament passed. It talks about legislative reconciliation as “the enactment of legislation 'to respect, promote, protect, and accommodate inherent rights through mechanisms or frameworks elaborated upon within the statute'”. They looked at the construction of this statute, particularly recognizing the jurisdiction of indigenous governments and the very essential character of the relationships among parents, children, families and communities. Healing and having some autonomy over those relationships are essential to reconciliation. The court certainly considered all of those different aspects of law, and the UN declaration in particular, in reaching its opinion.
In terms of the program itself, I don't know if my colleagues want to add on.