Yes, Ms. Dancho, you or other members are free to invite any ministers or any other witnesses at a future date.
Colleagues, to be very clear, what we are speaking about right now is this specific motion that was just presented by Mr. Ste-Marie. My understanding—and I hope that understanding is still correct—is that we have agreement among the parties to adopt this motion. Rather than call a vote, I'm just looking for unanimous consent for the motion presented that's in front of us.
(Motion agreed to)
Colleagues, thank you for a productive and interesting first meeting.
Right before I adjourn, I'll say that it's very important for the clerk and the analysts that as soon as we are able, we get them the names and contact information—highlighting, bolding and italicizing contact information, although the italicization might not add anything—so that they can prepare. If you have witnesses for the study we adopted through the motion that was presented by Ms. Dancho earlier, please ensure that you're getting them as quickly as possible to the clerk and to the analysts, and then I'll make a decision about how we go forward.
The current plan, colleagues, is for us to reconvene on Monday. You will have to wait until there's an official notice sent out, but the plan is for us to convene, at which point we will continue our discussion. We'll try to see if we can get some witnesses ready for Monday, but in the absence of that, we'll have to pivot.
As a reminder, Wednesday's meeting will include having the CRTC commissioner, who was unable to join us on Monday, for one hour.
Ms. Dancho.
