Thank you, Mr. Falk.
I appreciate the subamendment. I would just observe that if we have each of those ministers for two hours and have only six meetings, that means we have four meetings for all other witnesses. I know we all love to hear what ministers have to say on topics of national importance, but I think that, in a project where we have the prospect of informing policy, the large balance of witness testimony should be from those who can actually inform us, who can then help inform our report and then inform ministers. This is a huge space and a somewhat new space, definitely, for new members of this House. I think hearing from as many experts and players in this sector as possible is a bit more important.
In short, I think that we always like to meet with the ministers. However, a topic of this nature requires expert testimony.