I can start, and then I will turn things over to Scott Hutton, who leads the work on reliability. Maybe I'll start with your second question first.
In terms of Internet competition, our recent decision opens things up so that competitors can use the networks of big companies to offer Internet services to consumers in areas where they haven't offered before, so it opens up choice. More competition isn't for the sake of more competition; it's for the sake of lower prices, more choice and all of the good benefits that come from that. That was the thinking behind that decision to open things up and increase competition. It was very focused on Canadians.
At the same time, and coming to your first question before I turn things over to Scott, we also made sure that there were measures in place to continue to promote investment in high-quality networks, because we know that this is very, very important, both on the Internet side and the cellphone side.
We made sure, through the cost, because it's an actual cost-based analysis, that the rates that we have put in place take into account investing in fibre. I mentioned that we have a head start rule. There's a certain period of time when competitors can't access the fibre, and that'll go on. That's the five-year head start rule. There are things that we put in place so that we can ensure continued investment, because we know how important that is.
I'll turn things over to Scott, who leads the work on resiliency for the CRTC, and, again, we work with ISED and many others in that space.