Unfortunately, as we've seen by the statistics, Canada is not fully prepared. Because we've had our voluntary anti-scam coalition in place for a couple years, we're probably ahead of many or most countries from the point of view of better understanding the risks, but like every country except Australia, we don't actually have a comprehensive, cross-sector, public-private initiative in place.
I think we could get there fairly rapidly. The government does have a national anti-fraud strategy. It is creating the financial crimes agency. It has an opportunity for AML regime reform. I could picture us being in a position to actually bend the curve on this and reduce scams and fraud within a couple of years.
Once Australia figured out how to do it, they very quickly had results. We're on the cusp of getting there, but a key part of that is thinking about how we work across aligning clear definitions with a cross-sector framework, so that all the different players know the roles they need to play and we have controls for the various sectors.
As our colleagues have mentioned here, each sector has its own regulators, but we need some sort of overlay to make sure there's coordination. As part of making it effective, we need improved fraud data sharing, oversight of that and public education.
We've done a lot on the public education front—