I don't think I'll be speaking directly to the idea of removing life supports, but there's always a balance to be struck. I mentioned macro policy and market framework policies. There are also funding and support systems at different levels of the government that apply to skills enhancement, training, education, communities in transition, adjustment--the ability, if you will, to adjust and be agile, such that, as the market forces and the life cycle of firms and industries are moving, they can help facilitate and enable those communities, those workers, or those firms.
In some cases we have some programming, such as in the textiles area, where we have had for a number of years some programming in place to help facilitate the transformation when firms are looking to go into higher-value, more competitive positioning; also in the innovation system, where we attempt to have funding in areas that will allow for market opportunities and for successful firms—your RIMs, if you will—to emerge.
Can I identify specific ones? Even in an industry such as textiles, where there has been a structural decline occurring, or.... I'll drop back for a moment to an industry I'm personally more familiar with, which is the agrifood sector. Just go back to the wine industry in Canada. A number of years ago it was seen as not being particularly competitive internationally. But through a process of adopting standards, putting in higher value and new breeds of grapes, adding technology to the processes, and doing some good marketing, it's an industry that has managed to turn itself around, and there are investments flowing into the grapes and wine industry.