We know now that it is not anti-NAFTA. We're not arguing tit-for-tat with the U.S., because the U.S. has a similar model.
Mind you, if you're going to get federal funds to compete in these RFPs or procurement processes, 60% needs to be made in the U.S. When you're assembling it, as an OEM would, 100% needs to be done. You can have different components, but 60% needs to be American made, and 100% needs to be done in the U.S. That's outside of the NAFTA purview and it's perfectly legal for that treaty. And that's a permanent thing. We're arguing that in the same vein, for the next two years, to make sure we're going to survive this, we implement a program right away so that we're not closing up shop and can continue to feed into these growth markets. We don't see that as protectionist.
Sure, we'd like to go through legal, just to make sure, obviously, but we see this in the same vein, except that we see it as a short-term measure. Then we would stop it. because we, as an association, as an industry, do not believe in that. We don't believe in protectionist policies either, but, like the government and most political parties, we do believe there's a place and time when you do have to stimulate. You do have to put some money into the economy to make sure things just don't stop on a dime and collapse in such a way that you'll never see a resurgence.