I totally agree. I will add two more.
One is innovation. Without innovation, our industry is going nowhere. This is a business in which you have to dream and have to come up with new solutions, either for us to better train people, or for Pratt & Whitney to have engines that will not cause people to complain that they're too noisy or too dirty or whatever it is, and a new aircraft that is so light that it will help on the energy side and everything else. Innovation is key.
And how do we do innovation? We have an incredible base. CAE has the biggest base of engineers in one place in Canada, which is Montreal; we have 1,250 on the spot in the same place. Constantly they look at how they can improve in our business. I know my colleagues have the same situation.
By the way, for innovation—we've stressed this point many times—we need government support to do R and D, because our colleagues somewhere else around the world get military contracts to do it, non-repayable; we repay. We're fine with this, but we have to have the government support.
The other one is that when we start talking about new military programs, in whatever it is—but let's take the example of the JSS—we have to be at the table from day one. If you want us to get good IRBs, if you want us to have technologies that are developed in Canada, we must be there from the beginning, be part of the discussion with DND and with all the suppliers around the world.
These are the two points I would add to those of my colleague Claude.