When you talk about pensions, these are all part of the high costs, legacy costs, that exist with companies, such as DaimlerChrysler, Ford, and General Motors, that have been around for a century providing literally tens of thousands of employees with a very high standard of living. It's something that's evolved over time. Those costs are huge. Part of their restructuring in their plan going forward is, how can you compete in a global market and still carry that additional cost associated with your employees?
Clearly a lot of focus is on that going forward: how do you reduce those legacy costs and remain competitive in a fiercely competitive market? I'll let them speak further on this, but clearly it's one of the things that have to be dealt with as we go forward, because new entrants into Canada, if they're importing from abroad, don't have those costs. So you can see there's a huge differential there on those in Canada who have those costs and those who don't.
If I may pick up on your last question, the Canadian Automotive Partnership Council actually issued a recommendation that Canada really give serious consideration as to how to go forward with the FTA in a manner that does not adversely affect the auto industry. And that included not just the companies here today, but also Toyota and Honda, as well as parts makers. So there's a broad industry support, and a concern, about moving forward with the FTA.