Yes, I want to add a couple more points.
On the military procurement, clearly for us, whether it's Boeing, or whether it's Lockheed, as Mr. Boag was saying, what we're looking for from Quebec is, particularly, how did those industrial regional benefits flow down to our SMEs, and how can we use that to leverage the growth of our SMEs? That is a major issue for us in Quebec.
On the subject of ITAR or anything related to ITAR, the International Trade in Arms Regulations, there was a recent decision, I think, in the Department of Commerce not to go further with the export administration regulations into linking it to the country of birth rather than the country of citizenship, which would have complicated matters even more.
ITAR has been a fact of life since March 15, 1999, and it's a consideration for every organization in Canada to get good at managing that data and to get good relationships with the organizations in the United States. Once those links are made, often--even now with these export regulations--it's manageable; it's just a little bit more paperwork. But it's actually becoming more and more fluid, and there is also, on certain aspects, a Canadian exemption.
So I would encourage support for those things in information sessions, but any attempt to actually take those regulations further I would have very strong opinions about, and we're very happy about the decision not to go any further with the EAR.